Seaweed Commons Releases a Position Paper Urging for a Precautionary Approach to the Development of the Seaweed Aquaculture Industry

Amanda Swinimer penned a position paper in collaboration with the Seaweed Commons (www.seaweedcommons.org) in response to concerns about a rapidly growing, largely unregulated, and well-funded corporate seaweed aquaculture industry. The paper outlines our position that this industry should developed using a precautionary approach that protects our coastlines, biodiversty and the wellbeing of coastal communities. From the paper:

“As an international collective of seaweed growers, harvesters, scientists and advocates, we support a collaboratively managed and locally controlled seaweed industry. The Seaweed Commons supports an ecosystem-based approach to the development of the industry that is informed by research to ensure that farms are in appropriate locations, of an appropriate size, and protect biodiversity.”

Read the full paper here: Seaweed Commons position paper

Learn more about the Seaweed Commons here: Seaweed Commons

Virtual Book Launch Party for The Science and Spirit of Seaweed November 13th at 7:00 pm!

Time to celebrate and you are invited!

 

My virtual book launch party for The Science and Spirit of Seaweed is Saturday November 13th from 7:00 pm to 8:00 pm. I will be in conversation with my friend Brooke Fader. Brooke is convivium leader of Slow Food VI, founding member of Slow Fish Canada and co-owner of Wild Mountain Food and Drink restaurant. 

 

Anna Comfort O’Keeffe from Harbour Publishing will be introducing the event and we have partnered with Mermaid Tales Bookshop in Tofino.

 

I hope you will bring a glass of bubbles, a hot tea or whatever you enjoy and help me celebrate. There will be lots of time to ask me any questions you have about my book or about seaweed. 

 

You can register for FREE here: https://www.eventbrite.ca/e/the-science-and-spirit-of-seaweed-the-official-book-launch-tickets-203385891677

 

I hope to see you on Saturday!

 

Slow Fish 2021 Virtual Gathering March 18-27

Hello seaweed and ocean enthusiasts,

I am excited to share that Slow Food USA is hosting the first-ever virtual Slow Fish gathering in March of 2021! The gathering is an online collective of fish harvesters, folks in and around the seafood supply chain, experts, and enthusiasts from across North America and around the world working to create more direct and equitable seafood systems. 

Between March 18-27, this virtual gathering will consist of 6 days of interactive programming including ‘Deep Dive’ discussions on critical issues, World Café roundtables, Marketplace of Ideas, music, poetry and more ways to connect, collaborate, and celebrate Slow Fish! I am personally speaking during the Deep Dive: Aquaculture session scheduled for March 25th at 9:30am PT. In particular, I will explore protecting wild seaweed ecosystems in light of a growing, industrial-scale seaweed aquaculture industry. I encourage you to tune in for all of the wonderful discussions and presentations that Slow Fish 2021 will be offering. If you are interested please head over to https://slowfoodusa.org/slow-fish/slow-fish-2021/ and check out what else will be going on and sign up! 

Very best,

Amanda



Fucoidan

Fucoidans are a class of sulfated, fucose-rich polysaccharides located primarily in the cell walls of brown seaweeds. They provide structure and are thought to help protect the seaweed against desiccation. Indeed, it has been found that seaweeds in the mid to high intertidal zone typically have higher fucoidan contents than those in the lower intertidal and subtidal zones. Fucoidan was first isolated from the brown seaweeds Ascophyllum nodosum, Fucus vesiculosus, Laminaria digitata and Laminaria saccharina (now Saccharina latissima) by Dr. Kylin of Uppsala University, Sweden in 1913. There are different kinds of fucoidans with different levels of sulfation, and fucoidan molecules are diverse across different species. Until recently, fucoidan was thought to be unique to brown seaweeds, but it has now been discovered in a few species of marine invertebrates including sea cucumbers and in the egg coating of sea urchins. Fucoidan content is affected by seasonality, climate and geographic location. Fucoidan is a water-soluble, dietary fibre.

 

Fucoidan is the subject of well over a thousand studies. Currently, it is being exhaustively investigated for its potential role in cancer prevention and therapy. Research has reported the following anticancer effects of fucoidan: targeting of cancer cells and cancer cell death by apoptosis; increase in immune function including T-cell interferon production and macrophage phagocytosis; impairment of tumour progression by inhibiting cell proliferation, cell migration, angiogenesis, tumour vascularization, invasion, and metastasis. Published, peer-reviewed studies have reported fucoidan-induced anticancer effects on the following types of cancers: breast, uterine, ovarian, prostate, lung, stomach, esophageal, colon, leukemia, lymphoma, pancreatic and bladder cancer. Researchers report that fucoidan shows excellent cytotoxic selectivity, meaning it selectively targets apoptosis in cancer cells while leaving healthy cells alone. The majority of these studies are in vitro or in vivo using animal models. Fucoidan has also been shown to help alleviate undesirable side effects of chemotherapy and radiation and some studies suggest it may potentiate some conventional therapies. Fucoidan extracts from brown seaweeds are sold and marketed as a nutraceutical for the prevention of cancer and as a supportive therapy. 

 

In addition to the reported anticancer effects of fucoidan, research has also shown fucoidan to have antiviral, antibacterial, anti-inflammatory, anticoagulant, antiadhesive, anti-obesity, cardioprotective, neuroprotective and immunomodulatory effects. Furthermore, studies have shown fucoidan to help normalize blood sugar levels, induce osteoblast formation and inhibit osteoclast differentiation (suggesting potential as an osteoporosis preventative) and inhibit Th2 and IgE overproduction associated with allergies. Studies on fucoidan have also reported numerous positive effects on gastrointestinal health including the promotion of healthy gut flora, inhibition of pathogenic bacteria, the cleansing of toxins and imparting a soothing, coating effect on mucous membranes.

 

Fucoidan is bioavailable simply by consuming most brown seaweeds. It is safe, non-toxic and can be consumed by people of all ages. In my research, I found more positive attributes associated with fucoidan than any other novel and unique compound in seaweeds, and it appears to have the most diverse potential for supporting human health. Phycologists suggest its role in protecting seaweed…perhaps it protects us in a similar way.

Basic structure of a fucoidan molecule.

Basic structure of a fucoidan molecule.

 

References

 

Cumashi, A., Ushakova, N.A., Preobrazhenskaya, M.E., D’Incecco, A., Piccoli, A., Totani, L., Tinari, N., Morozevich, G.E., Breman, A.E., Bilan, M.I., Usov, A.I., Ustyuzhanina, N.E., Grachev, A. A., Sanderson, C.J., Kelly, M., Rabinovich, G.A., Iacobelli, S., Nifantiev, N.E., Consorzio Interuniversitario Nazionale perla Bio-Oncologia (CINBO), Italy, 2007. A comparative study of the anti-inflammatory, anticoagulant, antiangiogenic, and antiadhesive activities of nine different fucoidans from brown seaweeds. Glycobiology 17, 541-552. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/glycob/cwm014

 

Damonte, E., Matulewwicz, M., Cerezo, A., 2004. Sulfated seaweed polysaccharides as antiviral agents. Curr. Med. Chem. 11, 2399-2419. http://dx.doi.org/10.2174/0929867043364504.  

 

Hsu, H., Hwang, P., 2019. Clinical applications of fucoidan in translational medicine for adjuvant cancer therapy. Clin. Trans. Med. 8, 15. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40169-019-0234-9.

 

Jhamandas, J., Wie, M., Harris, K., MacTavish, D., Kar, S., 2005. Fucoidan inhibits cellular and neurotoxic effects of b-amyloid (Ab) in rat cholinergic basal forebrain neurons. European Journal of Neuroscience 21, 2649-2659.

 

Lee, H., Do, H., Lee, S., Sohn, E., Pyo, S., Son, E., 2007. Effects of fucoidan on neuronal cell proliferation-association with NO production through the iNOS pathway. Journal of Food Sciences and Nutrition 12, 74-78. 

 

Park, H., Kim, G.,, Nam, T., Deuk Mim, N., Hyun Choi, Y., 2011. Antiproliferative activity of fucoidan was associated with the induction of apoptosis and autophagy in AGS human gastric cancer cells. J. Food Sci. 76, T77-T83. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1750-3841.2011.02099.x

 

Yamamoto, I., Maruyama, H., Takahashi, M., Komiyama, K., 1986. The effects of dietary or intraperitoneally injected seaweed preparations on the growth of sarcoma-180 cells subcutaneously implanted into mice. Cancer Lett. 30, 125-131.

The Health of the Oceans Series #3 Marine Microplastic Pollution…“Mermaids’ Tears”

“Today we use plastic – a material designed to last forever – for products designed to last minutes.”

~Upstream, non-profit organization

 

Many of us have heard the alarming statistic that by 2050 there will be more plastic by weight in the ocean than fish. The problem is insidious: plastics have been found in the digestive tract and tissues of marine creatures from birds to whales, from fish to oysters. This indestructible material with near magical strength and versatility can be almost limitlessly recycled, and should have been reserved for such uses as life-saving medical technologies and reusable food packaging in a closed-loop recycling system. Unfortunately, society treats plastic as a disposable item. Everything from pre-made salads, cut-up fruit, sandwiches, pens, batteries, shampoo, moisturisers, hand wipes and countless foods, drinks, personal care items, toys, and much more comes in single-use plastics: plastic purposely designed to be used only once. Ready-made food and drinks that will be consumed within minutes comes in a container that will last generations in our environment, and, as research is now showing, will become incorporated into the food chain. When you dispose of plastic, it doesn’t actually go away, as is evidenced on beaches the world over. 

 

In the environment, plastic only breaks down into smaller pieces: it doesn’t biodegrade, meaning it doesn’t change molecular structure into something that can be reused by nature. Microplastics, defined as pieces of plastic less than 5 mm long, are especially hazardous and have come to be known as “mermaids’ tears.” These mermaids’ tears are the perfect size to be ingested. Hundreds of species of animals show evidence of plastic ingestion, including whales, seals, seabirds, turtles, sharks, fish, shrimp, corals, crabs and even filter feeders such mussels, clams and oysters. More than a million sea creatures die each year due to the ingestion of plastic. In many cases there is such a large amount of plastic in the gastrointestinal tract that the animal can no longer ingest and absorb enough nutrients to survive, eventually dying of starvation. Furthermore, microplastics have an affinity for toxins, specifically persistent organic pollutants (POPs). POPs are a group of toxins harmful to humans and animals that resist environmental degradation and can persist for many years in the environment, bioaccumulating in the food chain. POPs include toxins such as dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane (DDT), polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) and dioxins. The risk POPs pose to human health is severe enough that in 2001, more than 90 countries signed a United Nations Treaty known as the Stockholm Convention, pledging to reduce or cease production and use of specific POPs. In addition to leaching out toxic chemicals used in the production of most types of plastic, microplastics also adsorb hydrophobic POPs. They are incredibly efficient at accumulating these toxins, typically having concentrations many times greater than the surrounding water. In a study by Mato et al. in 2001, concentrations of PCBs and dichlorodiphenyldichloroethylene (DDE), a chemical formed from the breakdown of DDT, were found to be 100 000 to 1 000 000 times greater on microplastics than in the surrounding seawater. When these toxin-carrying ‘mermaids’ tears’ are ingested, they not only cause hazards to the digestive tract, they can also be poisonous as the toxic chemicals are transferred from the microplastic to the organism. 

Microplastics have been found in water samples and in the tissues of animals from all over the world’s oceans, including such remote places as the Southern Ocean and Mariana’s Trench, which lies more than 11 km beneath the surface and is the deepest place in the ocean. Microplastics have several sources and are classified as either primary or secondary. Primary microplastics are plastics that are less than 5 mm in size when they enter the environment. Textiles made from synthetic microfibres, such as fleece, acrylic and nylon, slough off many tiny pieces of plastic when washed that drain into the sewage system where they are too small for most wastewater systems to filter. In a study by Napper and Thompson (2016), an average of 700 000 microfibres were shed in a 6 kg wash load of acrylic fibre. Microfibres, considered to be the greatest source of primary microplastic pollution, are estimated to be the source of up to 35% of microplastic pollution and have been found in every region of the world’s oceans (Henry et al., 2019). Two thirds of clothing today is produced from synthetic fibres. Recently there has been mounting evidence that wear and tear from car tires, which releases tiny pieces of plastic into the environment, may be a comparable source of microplastic pollution, with 2017 estimates putting it at 5-10% of global marine plastic pollution (Kole et al., 2017). 

 

Microbeads, another significant source of microplastic pollution, are tiny beads of plastic used as abrasives in products such as cosmetics, shampoo, toothpaste and cleaners. Like microfibres, these plastic particles are too small to be filtered by sewage treatment plants and end up in rivers, lakes and oceans. Fortunately, the Canadian government banned the production, import and sale of products containing microbeads in 2019, following the lead of the U.S.A. and the U.K. Currently the United Nations is urging a worldwide ban on microbeads. Nurdles, small plastic pellets which are used in the production of most plastic products, are yet another significant contributor to marine microplastic pollution. Nurdles are typically the size of a lentil and enter the environment through spillage, both during production and in transport. 

 

The majority of microplastics, however, are “secondary microplastics”: small plastic pieces created by the breaking down of larger plastic pollution. It is much harder to study the impact of secondary microplastics on the health of marine organisms and ultimately human health because of their variability in composition, size and shape. In all forms, microplastics pose a threat to diverse living organisms. The WHO describes microplastics as “ubiquitous in the environment” and states that they “have been detected in marine water, wastewater, fresh water, food, air and drinking-water, both bottled and tap water” (World Health Organization, 2019).

 

Disposable Plastic Water Bottles

 

Worldwide, an estimated 20 000 plastic water bottles are purchased every second, and the trillions of bottles being disposed of are a major contributor to plastic pollution (Laville and Taylor, 2017). Moreover, the water inside these bottles appears to be contaminated by the very pollution their packaging creates. In a 2018 study by Mason et al., 11 brands of globally sourced bottled water purchased from 19 locations in 9 different countries were tested to determine the presence of microplastics. Of the 259 bottles tested, 93% contained microplastics. Ironically but not surprisingly, Mason et al. report that the data suggests the microplastic contamination at least partially comes from plastic water bottle-sourced pollution. 

 

Microplastic pollution is also prevalent in tap water. In a 2018 study by Kosuth et al., 89% of 159 samples of globally sourced tap water had microplastic contamination. However, currently available data suggests that overall microplastic contamination is significantly higher in bottled water, although the level of contamination is highly variable among samples, even samples from the same brand of bottled water or source of tap water. One of the most disheartening facts about disposable water bottles is that they are made out of polyethylene terephthalate (PET), which is one of the most easily recyclable types of plastic, yet the vast majority end up as garbage. Even those that do get recycled usually end up being downcycled and used in products such as carpeting and packaging rather than going back into bottles. Water bottles are one of the most common forms of plastic found washed up on beaches.

 

plastic barnacle.jpg


Positive Impactful Solutions

 

*Choose products that are not packaged in single-use plastics.

 

*Bring your own bags, including produce bags, to the grocery store.

 

*Shop at packaging-free stores. Independent stores are popping up across Canada and beyond which offer a variety of products package-free. Bring your own containers and fill at the store. Here are two packaging-free stores in Victoria:

~Zero Waste Emporium -1728 Douglas Street, Victoria, B.C. (Grocery, Personal Care & Cleaning Supplies)

~West Coast Refill -1319 Broad Street, Victoria, B.C. (Personal Care & Cleaning Supplies)

 

*Tell your government representatives that you want action taken to address the plastic pollution crisis. Vote for parties who include a plan in their platform to eliminate single-use plastics.

 

*Support organizations that have a campaign to educate the public about the issue of marine plastic pollution and that are working to get legislation to ban single-use plastics and non-recyclable plastics. Here are some Canadian organizations with links to information on their marine plastic pollution campaigns:

~Oceana Canada https://oceana.ca/en?_ga=2.113011780.1980332101.1603205498-1798504249.1603205498

~Environmental Defence https://environmentaldefence.ca/canadas-plastic-pollution-problem/

~Plastic Oceans https://plasticoceans.ca

In March of 2019, a young Cuvier beaked whale was found in the Davao Gulf of the Philippines looking emaciated and vomiting blood. It soon died and 40 kg (88 lbs) of plastic was discovered in its stomach. It was determined that the young whale died of starvation due to the ingestion of plastic. UNESCO estimates 100 000 marine mammals die from the ingestion of plastic each year.

References

Henry, B., Laitala, K., Klepp, I., 2019. Microfibres from apparel and home textiles: Prospects for including microplastics in environmental sustainability assessment. Sci. Total Environ. 652, 483-494. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.10.166.  

Kole, P., Löhr, A., Van Belleghem, F., Ragas, M., 2017. Wear and tear of tyres: a stealthy source of microplastics in the environment. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 14, 1265.

Kosuth, M., Mason, S.,, Wattenberg, E., 2018. Anthropogenic contamination of tap water, beer and sea salt. Plos One  https://doi.org/10.1371/joournal.pone.0194970.  

Laville, Sandra, and Taylor, Matthew. (2017, June 28). A million bottles a minute: World's plastic binge 'as dangerous as climate change'. Retrieved from https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2017/jun/28/a-million-a-minute-worlds-plastic-bottle-binge-as-dangerous-as-climate-change

Mason, S., Welch, V., Neratko, J., 2018. Synthetic polymer contamination in bottled water. 

Front Chem. 6, 407. https://doi.org/10.3389/fchem.2018.00407.  

Mato, Y., Isobe, T., Takada, H., Kanehiro, H., Ohtake, C., Kaminuma, T., 2001. Plastic resin pellets as a transport medium for toxic chemicals in the marine environment. Envrion. Sci. Technol. 35, 318-324. https://doi.org/10.1021/es0010489.  

Napper, I., Thompson, R., 2016. Release of synthetic microplastic plastic fibres from domestic washing machines: effects of fabric type and washing conditions. Marine Pollution Bulletin 112 (1). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2016.09.025.  

World Health Organization (2019). Microplastics in drinking-water. Retrieved from 

https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/326499/9789241516198-eng.pdf?ua=1  

 

The Health of the Oceans Series #2 Unsustainable Aquaculture Part 2: Tropical Farmed Shrimp

By Amanda Swinimer

In The Health of the Oceans Series #2, I discuss the environmental, social justice and health implications of two of the most unsustainable aquaculture industries in the world: open-net pen salmon farms and conventional tropical farmed shrimp. In Part 2, I discuss perhaps the most unsustainable aquaculture industry in the world: tropical farmed shrimp. This industry has devastating effects on both the environment and people. It has an estimated carbon footprint greater than industrially raised beef, it has been linked to human trafficking, rape and murder and it is destroying and displacing communities and ecosystems. In addition, studies suggest there could be serious health implications associated with eating tropical farmed shrimp. 

 

Tropical Farmed Shrimp

 

Tropical farmed shrimp (here I use the word shrimp to mean both prawns and shrimp) are one of the most unsustainable foods in the world. The developed world’s thirst for cheap prawns is driving an industry that is associated with severely destructive ecological practises and extreme social injustice. Shrimp are currently the most popular seafood in the U.S.A. (Food and Agricultural Organization of the United Nations) and 90% of shrimp consumed in the U.S.A. is imported, with the vast majority coming from Southeast Asia and Central America (Guy, 2017).

 

Ecologist Boone Kauffman of Oregon State University estimates that shrimp produced on a typical Asian shrimp farm have an estimated carbon footprint ten times greater than beef produced on deforested Amazon rainforest land, primarily because of where they are located (Stokstad, E., 2012). An estimated 50% to 60% of tropical shrimp farms are located in tidal zones in Asian countries, most of these on land that has been cleared of mangrove forests (Guy, 2017). Mangrove forests are one of the most productive ecosystems in the world, rich in biodiversity and play a critical ecological role. They act as giant filters to water entering the ocean and as a nursery and habitat to abundant and diverse marine species. They also help protect the land from erosion and damage from hurricanes and tsunamis. Furthermore, they sequester huge amounts of carbon and store it in a way that can contain it for thousands of years if left intact. The destruction of mangrove forests releases significant amounts of stored carbon back into the environment. In addition, shrimp farms on cleared mangrove tidal flats only last an average of five years, at which time contamination by acid sulfate soil and build-up of sludge renders the water inhabitable to shrimp (Stokstad, 2012). Moreover, in addition to pesticides and large amounts of excrement and bacteria, saltwater in the farm ponds also contaminates freshwater sources and arable land. This affects the availability of potable water, sanitation and forces entire communities to move. Oftentimes, the privatization of lands by shrimp farms blocks access to traditional fishing grounds. In many cases, wild fish that are a critical food source for local communities are used in the feed for the farmed shrimp, a specialty food exported to developed countries. As fish and other marine life that live and breed in mangrove forests disappear with their destruction, coastal fishers and their families that depend on healthy fish, crab, wild shrimp and other marine species for food and livelihood can suffer hunger, economic despair, food insecurity and displacement. Fishing in many of these communities is intergenerational and has occurred sustainably for generations. 

 

In addition to the social injustices caused by ecological destruction, the tropical fish farm industry is also associated with direct human rights abuses. Murder, rape and other horrific atrocities are linked with the tropical shrimp farming industry. In a 2003 report entitled “Smash and Grab: Conflict, Corruption and Human Rights Abuses in the Shrimp Farming Industry,” the Environmental Justice Foundation has documented reports of human rights abuses including murder, sexual abuse and rape, land seizure, child labour and forced labour. According to the report, people have been killed in shrimp farm-related violent conflict in at least eleven countries including Indonesia, India, Brazil, Bangladesh, Honduras, Ecuador, the Philippines, Mexico, Guatemala, Thailand and Vietnam. In Bangladesh, 150 people were killed for protesting against the shrimp farms. There has been reported child labour in the tropical shrimp farm industry in Bangladesh, Thailand, Indonesia, Sri Lanka, India, Cambodia, Peru, Ecuador, and Burma (Environmental Justice Foundation, 2003). Government and police are frequently complicit in these human rights abuses which are often perpetrated without fear of retribution.

An investigative article published by the Associated Press in 2015 found that human trafficking in Thailand is part of the supply chain of shrimp en route to North American markets, making its way onto the shelves and plates of companies including Walmart and Red Lobster. It was discovered that migrants, including children, are being sold and forced to peel shrimp. At the Gig Peeling Factory Burmese workers reported working 16 hour days peeling shrimp with their hands in freezing cold water for little or no money and not being allowed to leave. (Anusonadisai, 2015).

 

As if the harm to people and the environment isn’t enough, there are also significant health risks associated with tropical farmed shrimp. The crowded conditions of the farms makes the shrimp more susceptible to disease and parasites. The farmers deal with this by including antibiotics in the feed and using pesticides and fungicides, some of which are known carcinogens and harmful to human health. Moreover, the feed for the shrimp sometimes contains manure, such as pig feces (Uyen, 2015). A 2015 report by Consumer Reports found shrimp contaminated with antibiotics not permitted for use in shrimp farming in the U.S. as well as bacteria including E. coli, MRSA and vibrio (Consumer Reports, 2015).

 

Slow Fish, an international campaign promoting good, clean and fair seafood recommends avoiding tropical farmed shrimp and enjoying sustainably produced shrimp as a special occasion food. Here in B.C. we are extremely fortunate to have locally available shrimp including sidestripe shrimp (Pandalopsis dispar) and spot prawns (Pandalus platyceros) which are seasonally and sustainably fished. Entire festivals exist in several coastal communities in B.C. to celebrate the spot prawn season. Our local shrimp are much more expensive than tropical farmed shrimp coming from thousands of kilometres away but exemplify “good, clean and fair.” B.C. shrimp are vastly superior in nutrients, freshness, flavour and colour, are caught using sustainable methods that don’t damage the ecosystem, and shrimp fishers in B.C. receive a fair wage. The cheap price of tropical farmed shrimp is not representative of its true cost. A robust domestic market for sustainably harvested wild shrimp in B.C. benefits both consumers and fishers. 

spot prawn festival.jpg

Tips for Eating Sustainably

*Know where your food comes from and how it is produced

*Know your farmer

*Know your fisherman/fisherwoman/fishmonger

*Avoid unsustainable and unethical foods altogether

*Eat locally

*Eat seasonally

*Eat more foods lower on the food chain

Positive Impactful Actions

*Don’t buy tropical farmed shrimp

*Tell your political representatives to ban the import of tropical farmed shrimp

*Have conversations with family and friends about the issues surrounding tropical farmed shrimp. If most people knew about the ethical, environmental and social justice issues associated with tropical farmed shrimp I believe they would never support this industry.

*Reserve shrimp/prawns for special occasions and celebrations and buy the more expensive but sustainable choice, far superior in flavour and nutrition.

*Support a non-profit organization that has a campaign to educate people about the atrocities associated with the tropical farmed shrimp industry and one that is working to implement legislation to prevent the import of tropical farmed shrimp. Here are some:

            ~Slow Fish Canada, USA and International 

                        http://slowfood.ca/slow-fish/

                        https://slowfoodusa.org/slow-fish/

                        https://slowfood.com/slowfish/

            ~Oceana Canada, Oceana USA, Oceana International 

                        https://www.oceana.ca/en

                        https://usa.oceana.org

                        https://oceana.org

            

*Watch and share these documentaries about the impacts of the tropical farmed shrimp industry:

 

“Murky Waters: Investigating the Environmental and Social Impacts of Shrimp Farming in Bangledesh.” https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hPJpPEH3l7o

Swedish Society for Nature Conservation (SSNC). Ecostorm.

 

“The truth behind “organic” shrimp farming in Ecuador.” https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NNpkEgtCEB8

Naturskyddsföreningen.

 

“Grinding Nemo: A film about fish meal.” https://ecostorm.tv/2012/09/18/slavery-behind-our-seafood/

 

References

 

Anusonadisai, Nattasuda. (2015, December 21). Slavery in shrimp industry known to Thailand 

government. | CBC News. Retrieved from https://www.cbc.ca/news/business/slavery-shrimp-thailand-1.3374433

 

Canadian Imports / Exports: Canada has a responsibility to ensure the seafood we produce and 

import from elsewhere is ecologically and socially sustainable. (2018, February 13). Retrieved from https://www.seachoice.org/info-centre/markets/canadian-imports-exports/

 

Consumer Reports. (2015, April 24). How safe is your shrimp? Consumer Reports’ guide to 

choosing the healthiest, tastiest, and most responsibly sourced shrimp. Retrieved from https://www.consumerreports.org/cro/magazine/2015/06/shrimp-safety/index.htm

 

Environmental Justice Foundation (2003). Smash & Grab: Conflict, Corruption and Human 

Rights Abuses in the Shrimp Farming Industry. Retrieved from https://ejfoundation.org/resources/downloads/smash_and_grab.pdf

 

Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. (n.d.). GLOBEFISH - Information and 

Analysis on World Fish Trade: Farmed Shrimp output increased by about 6 percent in 2016. Retrieved from http://www.fao.org/in-action/globefish/market-reports/resource-detail/en/c/1136583/

 

Guy, Allison. (2017, February 14). 5 Facts That Will Make You Think Twice About Eating 

Imported, Farm-Raised Shrimp. Retrieved from https://oceana.org/blog/5-facts-will-make-you-think-twice-about-eating-imported-farm-raised-shrimp

 

How much U.S. Seafood is Imported? (2019, June 24). Retrieved from 

https://sustainablefisheries-uw.org/fact-check/how-much-seafood-is-imported/

 

Seafood Health Facts: Making Smart Choices – Balancing the Benefits and Risks of Seafood 

Consumption Resources for Healthcare Providers and Consumers. (2017). Overview of the U.S. Seafood Supply. Retrieved from https://www.seafoodhealthfacts.org/seafood-choices/overview-us-seafood-supply

 

Stokstad, Erik. (2012, February 17). The Carbon Footprint of a Shrimp Cocktail. Retrieved from 

https://www.sciencemag.org/news/2012/02/carbon-footprint-shrimp-cocktail

 

Tropical Farmed Shrimp. (n.d.). Retrieved from 

https://www.slowfood.com/slowfish/pagine/eng/pagina--id_pg=87.lasso.html

 

Uyen, Nguyen Dieu Tu. (2015, March 17). Asian Seafood Raised on Pig Feces Approved for U.S. 

Consumers. Retrieved from https://www.cornucopia.org/2015/03/asian-seafood-raised-on-pig-feces-approved-for-u-s-consumers/  

 

The Health of the Oceans Series #2 Unsustainable Aquaculture Part 1: Open-net Pen Salmon Farms

In The Health of the Ocean Series #2, I discuss the environmental, social justice and health implications of two of the most unsustainable aquaculture industries in the world: open-net pen salmon farms and tropical farmed shrimp. Part 1 discusses the issues associated with open-net pen salmon farms in British Columbia. 

 

Open-net Pen Salmon Farms

 

“We need to end salmon farming in our open oceans now to protect both wild salmon and Indigenous ways of being from extinction.”

~ Terry Teegee, regional chief of the B.C. Assembly of First Nations

 

Open-net pen salmon farming is a large, global industry which is having devastating effects on ecosystems, and in particular on wild salmon. In a 2016 report by SeaChoice, a Canadian non-profit organization that is a science-based seafood industry watchdog, open-net pen farmed Atlantic salmon comprised the highest volume of unsustainable seafood produced in Canada, an estimated 72% (SeaChoice, 2016). Open-net pen salmon farming involves the rearing of salmon fry, typically non-native to the location of the farm, in coastal waters where the salmon are contained in pens comprised of nets. The nets enable the free flow of water both into and out of the salmon pens, allowing for excrement, bacteria, viruses, parasites and pesticides to freely enter coastal waters. In B.C., an average salmon farm has between 10 and 30 pens that are each approximately 12 to 15 square metres, each containing approximately 20 000 salmon, the vast majority of which are non-native Atlantic salmon (Fraser River Keeper, n.d.). The salmon on these farms produce huge amounts of excrement which damage ecosystems through contamination and by causing toxic algal blooms. It is estimated that a farm of 200 000 salmon produces the same amount of waste as a city of 60 000 people (Sandvik et al., 2018). A typical farm in B.C. contains an average of 400 000 to 500 000 salmon. Other marine species that live in close proximity to salmon farms, such as clams and oysters, frequently become too contaminated for human consumption. 

 

Open-net pen salmon farms are frequently referred to as “the factory farms of the sea.” The extremely high density of fish on the farms makes the salmon more susceptible to disease. The increased risk is due not only to the close proximity of the fish and the massive amount of excrement in the environment but also because the confined, crowded conditions the salmon endure causes them to release stress hormones which suppress their immune system. According to fish pathologist Gary Marty, 10% of farmed fish in B.C. don’t make it to market, the majority of which die due to environmental conditions including low oxygen, toxic algae, and predation (Amy Smart, Victoria Times Colonist, 2017). In an attempt to fend off disease, which can lead to mass culling of salmon on farms, farmed salmon are routinely fed large amounts of antibiotics which are transferred to humans when the salmon is consumed. In addition, farmed salmon require 1.2 kg of feed to produce 1 kg of meat, and a significant part of the feed for farmed salmon is wild fish (Kjerski et al., 2018). Canada is the 4th largest producer of farmed salmon in the world and farmed salmon is B.C.’s largest agri-food export (Department of Fisheries and Oceans Canada, 2017). There are currently over 100 open-net pen salmon farms in B.C.’s coastal waters and more than 90% of the salmon farming industry in B.C. is owned by three Norwegian companies: Marine Harvest, Cermaq and Grieg Seafood (Findley, 2018). In my opinion, foreign-owned corporations do not have the same incentive that local communities have to protect resources, ecosystem integrity and wild salmon. B.C. is the last place in the Pacific Northwest to allow open-net pen salmon farms. Government bans of open-net pen salmon farms exist in Washington State, Oregon, California, Alaska and even parts of northern B.C.

 

Most, if not all, of the salmon farms in B.C. reside in the traditional territories and fishing grounds of First Nations peoples, the first human inhabitants of the expanse of land currently recognized as B.C. Archaeological findings show they have lived in the Pacific Northwest for at least 10 000 years. Salmon are woven into every aspect of the life and culture of coastal First Nations peoples and many coastal First Nations are dependent upon wild salmon for food, ceremony, cultural identity and livelihood. The issue of salmon farming is complex, as the industry provides many jobs and has brought economic prosperity to several remote communities. However, many First Nations peoples and their leaders oppose the presence of salmon farms on their traditional territories citing damage to the ecosystem and specifically the threat to wild salmon.

 

On the west coast of Canada in B.C. we have seven out of the ten species of Pacific salmon and 9000 distinct salmon populations (Pacific Salmon Foundation, n.d.). Born in rivers deep in the coastal rainforest and beyond, salmon travel hundreds, and for some species thousands, of kilometres across the ocean and then return to their natal river to spawn and die. Salmon literally connect the land to the sea in the Pacific Northwest. They provide an abundance of nutrients to countless iconic, west coast organisms including orcas, bears, bald eagles and even the canopy-forming trees of the ancient temperate rainforest. First Nations and commercial wild salmon fisheries exist in B.C. in addition to robust recreational salmon fishing. Gathering with friends in the summertime with a fresh-caught salmon on the barbeque is part of the lifestyle of coastal B.C., and whole communities exist whose economies are driven by salmon charter operators. Perhaps the most urgent and detrimental effect of open-net pen salmon farms are the risk they pose to wild salmon populations. 

 

Alexandra Morton is a marine biologist who has been studying orcas for decades. In her quest to uncover the cause of the declining numbers of B.C.’s distinct resident orca population, her focus turned toward salmon, the main food source of the resident orcas. During years of research, she discovered that salmon farms were having a detrimental effect on wild salmon populations by spreading disease and parasites. It was Morton who discovered that the Norwegian strain of piscine orthoreovirus (PRV), a highly contagious virus associated with the often fatal fish disease Heart and Skeletal Muscle Inflammation (HSMI), was present in salmon occupying farms directly in the migratory path of the Fraser River population of Chinook salmon. This population of salmon is the main food source (an estimated 82-90%) of the critically endangered southern resident killer whales (SRKW). Salmon affected by the disease are not strong enough to make the arduous swim upstream in their natal rivers in order to reach their breeding grounds. The disease can also be fatal, especially in juveniles. Studies show much higher rates of PRV in wild salmon populations close to farms where the virus is ubiquitous and some results suggest that PRV originating in farmed salmon may be affecting the fitness, reproductive success and survival of wild salmon (Morton et al., 2017). Morton has been fighting hard to bring this information to the public and to policymakers in order to bring about legislation that will protect wild salmon. PRV and its associated condition HSMI is just one of several diseases associated with farmed salmon. 

 

Sea lice are another significant problem associated with salmon farms. Sea lice are a type of external parasite that feeds on the mucous, epidermal tissue and blood of salmon and can cause death, especially in juveniles. Sea lice can spread from farms to wild salmon and are able to live off of their host for up to three weeks. The high numbers of confined salmon make salmon farms particularly prone to sea lice infestations, and it is not uncommon for farms to have to cull their own salmon as a result. The Department of Fisheries and Ocean’s threshold for sea lice on farmed salmon during the migration of wild juvenile salmon, from March 1st until the end of June, is three per fish. The First Nations Leadership Council (FNLC) assert that reports released by international aquaculture companies Cermaq, Mowi and Grieg suggest that 35% of salmon farms on B.C.’s coast exceeded the federal allowable limit. In addition, the findings of an independent report by Alexandra Morton on migrating juvenile salmon from four areas near salmon farms found high percentages of juvenile salmon infected with sea lice. The highest percentage was found on juvenile salmon migrating past salmon farms near the Discovery Islands off of northeastern Vancouver Island, where 94% of sampled fish were infected with sea lice (Morton, 2020). This area is the migratory path for the Fraser River population of sockeye salmon, which has seen among the largest declines of any B.C. salmon population. According to Morton, half of the salmon farms in the Discovery Islands region reported exceeding the federal allowable threshold of sea lice on farmed salmon. Furthermore, Morton asserts that sea lice were not reported on wild juvenile salmon prior to the presence of salmon farms and that the levels of infestation reported in her study are lethal to juvenile salmon. The FNLC attest that sea lice spreading from open-net pen salmon farms “are contributing to the massive decline in wild salmon stocks” (Rochelle Baker, The National Observer, 2020). Moreover, salmon farms release large amounts of pesticides into the water in an attempt to suppress sea lice infestations. These pesticides are harmful to the ecosystem and sea lice are becoming increasingly resistant to them. 

 

Another damaging and gruesome aspect of open-net pen salmon farms is that they release huge amounts of “blood water” into the ocean environment. Blood water is the waste from processing the farmed salmon. The issue of blood water was first brought to the attention of the public in 2017 when Tavish Campbell, an avid diver who works in the ecotourism industry, captured the bloody effluent on film. Campbell filmed blood water effluent from two farms off of Vancouver Island. One farm is located in a bay known to be a refuge for migrating juvenile sockeye salmon from strong tidal currents. Blood water samples have since been tested by the Atlantic Veterinary College and were found to contain high levels of PRV, the highly contagious virus associated with the potentially fatal fish disease HSMI.

 

The escape of farmed Atlantic salmon also has an impact on both the marine ecosystem and river ecosystems. Atlantic salmon are not native to the North Pacific and in addition to being voracious eaters, competing for the food sources of wild salmon and other wild species, may cause other unknown harms. In August of 2017, the nets of a U.S.-owned salmon farm near Victoria, B.C. broke and an estimated 305 000 Atlantic salmon escaped into the ecosystem. Farmed Atlantic salmon have been witnessed in the ocean hundreds of kilometres away from any farms. They have also been found in rivers, including the Fraser River, which is a spawning ground for Chinook salmon and contains the largest population of sockeye salmon in B.C. In June of 2020, two First Nations chiefs from the We Wai Kai and Wei Wai Kum nations called for the immediate removal of the Mowi Shaw Point farm, which is located in their traditional territory, following the escape of 1000 Atlantic salmon.

 

In addition to the distressing ethical issue of confining a fish that in the wild would travel hundreds, and for some species thousands, of kilometres over the course of its life, inhabiting both freshwater and saltwater, other significant ethical issues exist. The presence of thousands of fish in one area attracts large predators, including marine mammals. Even though it is illegal to shoot marine mammals in B.C., the Canadian government allows salmon farmers to shoot ‘nuisance’ seals and sea lions. Moreover, animals including dolphins, porpoises, seals, sea lions and birds get entangled in the farms’ nets and drown. 

 

Farmed salmon can also be harmful to human health. Levels of organic contaminants such as PCBs and heavy metals such as mercury have been found to be significantly higher in farmed salmon than in wild salmon, in some cases at levels that are considered dangerous to human health (Hites et al., 2004; Easton et al., 2002). Farmed salmon often contains high levels of antibiotics, which can affect human health both directly by consuming them and indirectly by creating strains of antibiotic-resistant bacteria. In addition, there is not enough information available to know the impacts of eating fish that may be diseased. Furthermore, while salmon are considered to be an extremely healthy and nutritious food which is high in omega-3s and protein and low in saturated fat, there are differences between wild salmon and farmed salmon: farmed salmon are fed an unnatural diet which includes terrestrial-based foods such as soybeans, wheat and feathers, and have an altered nutritional make-up. For example, farmed salmon have been found to be higher in saturated fat, calories and omega-6 fatty acids than wild salmon. Farmed salmon are also artificially coloured with a synthetic form of astaxanthin in order to appear pink like their wild counterparts. Marine astaxanthin, whose original source is microalgae, is a naturally occurring compound in organisms that wild salmon eat such as shrimp and krill. Algae are also the primary source of omega-3s in salmon, and indeed in all fish.

 

The Department of Fisheries and Oceans (DFO), the federal agency in Canada that regulates fisheries, acknowledges the dangers of open-net pen salmon farms but despite promises to remove them, the farms remain. The latest claims made by the DFO is that by 2025 they will transition to closed containment farms, farms that are located on land. While this would protect wild salmon, it doesn’t resolve the ethical issue of the treatment of salmon on the farms nor the overwhelming increase in energy and water required to operate closed containment farms. B.C. wild salmon stocks are currently the lowest in recorded history and in 2019 there were unprecedented salmon fishery closures, including for recreational fishing. 

 

Chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha)

Chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha)

Positive Impactful Actions

 

*Support a group that is campaigning to end fish farms on the migratory routes of wild salmon.

            Safe Salmon https://www.safesalmon.ca

            Friends of Clayoquot Sound http://focs.ca

            Georgia Strait Alliance https://georgiastrait.org

            Save Our wild Salmon https://www.wildsalmon.org

            Fraser River Keeper https://www.fraserriverkeeper.ca

            Watershed Watch https://watershedwatch.ca/fish-farms-out-of-discovery-islands/

 

*Call and/or email your government representative and let them know how you feel…they work for you! In B.C. the number to call is 250-387-1715 or toll free 1-800-663-7867 and the email address is premier@gov.bc.ca.

 

*Have conversations with family and friends about the issues surrounding wild salmon and open-net pen salmon farms. Sadly, many people specifically choose to buy farmed salmon because they believe it is helping to protect wild salmon.  

 

*Do not buy farmed salmon and when you are at a restaurant, ask if the salmon is wild or farmed. Tell you server that you will not order any dish prepared with farmed salmon. Letting businesses know how you feel can help to influence their choices.

 

References

Baker, Rochelle. (2020, June 30). B.C. First Nations leaders want immediate end to open-net salmon farms. The National Observer. Retrieved from https://www.nationalobserver.com/2020/06/30/news/bc-first-nations-leaders-want-immediate-end-open-net-salmon-farms

Canadian Imports / Exports: Canada has a responsibility to ensure the seafood we produce and import from elsewhere is ecologically and socially sustainable. (2018, February 13). Retrieved from https://www.seachoice.org/info-centre/markets/canadian-imports-exports/

Chief Brian Assu and Chief Chris Roberts (2020, June 18). We Wai Kai and Wei Wai Kum Nations Call for Immediate Cancellation of Finfish Aquaculture Tenure – Implementation of Collaborative Governance for farms in Laichkwiltach Territory. Retrieved from https://www.lkts.ca/sites/default/files/newsletter/2020.06.18%20We%20Wai%20Kai%20and%20Wei%20Wai%20Kum%20Press%20Release.pdf 

Department of Fisheries and Oceans Canada (2017, March 15). Farmed Salmon. Retrieved from https://www.dfo-mpo.gc.ca/aquaculture/sector-secteur/species-especes/salmon-saumon-eng.htm

Easton, M., Luszniak, D., Von der Geest, E., 2002. Preliminary examination of contaminant loadings in farmed salmon, wild salmon and commercial salmon feed. Chemosphere 46, 1053-1074. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0045-6535(01)00136-9.

 

Findlay, Andrew. https://douglasmagazine.com/controversy-salmon-fish-farms-british-columbia/ 2018.

Fraser Riverkeeper. (n.d.). Net Pen Salmon Farming. Retrieved from https://www.fraserriverkeeper.ca/net_pen_salmon_farming

Georgia Strait Alliance (n.d.). Salmon Aquaculture. Retrieved from https://georgiastrait.org/issues/other-issues/salmon-aquaculture/

Hites, R., Foran, J., Carpenter, D., Hamilton, M., Knuth, B., Schwager, S., 2004. Global assessment of organic contaminants in farmed salmon. Science 303, 226-229. http://doi.org/10.1126/science.1091447.

Kolanjinathan, K., Ganesh, P., Govindarajan, M., 2009. Antibacterial activity of ethanol extracts of seaweeds against fish bacterial pathogens. European Review for Medical and Pharmacological Sciences 13, 173-177. 

Morton, A., Routledge, R., Hrushowy, S., Kibenge, M., 2017. The effect of exposure to farmed salmon on piscine orthoreovirus infection and fitness in wild Pacific salmon in British Columbia, Canada. PLoS 12. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0188793.

Sandvik, Kjersti., Slettehaug, Ilina, Liudmilla. Salmon Treated Like Chicken. Panel at Terra Madre Salone del Gusto, Turin Italy. 2018.

Sprague, M., Dick, J., Tocher, D., 2016. Impact of sustainable feeds on omega-3 long-chain fatty acid levels in farmed Atlantic salmon, 2006-2015. Scientific Reports 6, 21892. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep21892

Fucoidan, a compound located in the cell walls of brown seaweeds, and its antiviral effect on COVID-19

Seaweeds have been widely studied for both their immune supporting properties and antiviral properties. In particular, studies have shown that fucoidan, a sulfated polysaccharide which exists in brown seaweeds, sea cucumbers and the egg sac of sea urchins, has potent immune system enhancement properties such as increased macrophage activity and the production of T-cells as well as potent antiviral activity including prevention of viral replication. A recent in vitro study by Kwon et al. published in the scientific journal Cell Discovery in July of 2020 studies the effects of heparin and fucoidans on the COVID-19 virus (SARS-CoV-2). The researchers in this study tested heparin, heparin sulfates and two types of fucoidan extracted from the brown seaweed and kelp Saccharina japonica: RPI-27 and RPI-28. All were found to have significant binding affinity to SARS-CoV-2, acting like a decoy and thus protecting the body’s own cells from binding to the virus. Of all the compounds tested, the fucoidan RPI-27 was the most effective, and RPI-28 was the second most effective. The researchers hypothesize that the superior ability of the fucoidans to bind to the virus are due to the shape of the molecule, which is highly branched. The heparin molecule is a straight chain. The effectiveness of RPI-27 in binding to the virus was “substantially” greater than the drug remdesivir, which is currently approved for emergency use in some countries for the treatment of severe COVID-19 infections. Fucoidan can be administered orally, through a nasal spray or inhaler whereas remesdivir has to be administered intravenously. Fucoidan showed no toxicity even at the highest concentrations that were tested, and previous studies have also reported no toxicity.

Basic structure of a fucoidan molecule

Basic structure of a fucoidan molecule

References

Kwon, P., Oh, H., Kwon, S-J., Jin, W., Zhang, F., Fraser, K., Hong, J., Linhardt, R., Dordick, J., July 2020. Sulfated polysaccharides effectively inhibit SARS-CoV-2 in vitro. Cell Discovery 6 (1). http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41421-020-00192-8